In 1992, Robert Kaplan and David Norton published “The Balanced Scorecard: Measures That Drive Performance” in the Harvard Business Review.1 The article argued that financial metrics alone were insufficient for managing a company. Organizations needed to track performance across four perspectives simultaneously: financial, customer, internal processes, and learning and growth.
Kaplan was a professor at Harvard Business School. Norton was the president of a consulting firm called Renaissance Solutions. Their collaboration began with a 1990 research project sponsored by twelve companies investigating new methods of performance measurement.2
The concept spread rapidly through corporate management. By 2001, a Harvard Business Review survey estimated that roughly half of large American firms and 40 percent of European firms had adopted some form of balanced scorecard.3
The balanced scorecard addressed a specific historical moment. Financial accounting, rooted in systems developed centuries earlier, measured tangible assets. By the 1990s, an increasing share of corporate value resided in intangible assets: brand reputation, employee knowledge, process efficiency, and customer relationships.
Critics argued that the scorecard oversimplified complex systems and gave managers a false sense of control over unmeasurable factors.4 Proponents countered that the alternative was worse: managing exclusively by financial outcomes meant reacting to history rather than shaping the future.
Kaplan and Norton expanded the concept in subsequent books, including The Strategy-Focused Organization in 2001 and Strategy Maps in 2004.5 Government agencies, nonprofits, and military organizations adapted the framework. The U.S. Army adopted a version for organizational assessment in the late 1990s.
Timeline
- 1990 — A research project sponsored by twelve companies began investigating alternatives to purely financial performance measurement.
- 1992 — Kaplan and Norton published the Balanced Scorecard framework in the Harvard Business Review.
- 2001 — Roughly half of large American firms had adopted some form of balanced scorecard.
Footnotes
-
Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton, “The Balanced Scorecard: Measures That Drive Performance,” Harvard Business Review 70, no. 1 (January-February 1992): 71-79. ↩
-
Kaplan and Norton, The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1996), ix-xii. ↩
-
Harvard Business Review, adoption surveys cited in Kaplan and Norton, The Strategy-Focused Organization (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2001). ↩
-
H. Norreklit, “The Balance on the Balanced Scorecard: A Critical Analysis,” Management Accounting Research 11, no. 1 (2000): 65-88. ↩
-
Kaplan and Norton, Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2004). ↩